Thursday 23rd August 2007

M103

I managed to get the scope out last night for the first time in ten days. It was overcast with hazy gaps between the clouds and a blustery wind which tried very hard to disrupt my imaging. In a three hour session I only managed to add two M’s to my Messier Catalogue, M52 and M103. M103 was a replacement for a 1004x version of the cluster I had taken last year. Having the LX mod helped to capture the detail of this little cluster, and also picked up the colours which was nice to compare with the black and white original.

The effect of wind on the scope was very noticable, with maybe 1 in 2 frames spoiled by streaky stars. One day I’ll have an observatory to keep everything sheltered, but not until my numbers come up on the lottery!

Monday 13th August 2007

I aimed my video camera skywards last night (Sunday 12th) to try and pick up a perseid or two, but the camera is not sensitive enough and I didn’t get anything.

I watched for a while and saw one bright meteor that travelled south to north, followed quickly by two more travelling east – west but I don’t think any of these count as perseids.

 It seems from the guys on QCUIAG that I should have used my modified SPC900NC with a normal lens. I could have set it to 10 second exposures and left it for hours, I’ll know better next time.

By 12:30 I’d had enough, nothing more to report.

Friday 10th August 2007

k3ccd_0003-m51-a.jpg
Another breezy evening so very few usable frames last night.  I did manage to get an improved M51 so I’ve updated my Messier list, but my M57 is about the same as the one I already had and M63 and M64 had too few frames to stack.
k3ccd_0000-m57.jpg
You can see from the M51 image here that Amp glow is starting to become an issue. This image was made with 17×60 second exposures taken from an AVI with 46 frames. That’s a lot of wasted time and effort, I think some were spoiled by the PE rather than the weather, so at least I can do something about that.

M57 was taken from a stack of 42x18second exposures, however less than 20 were usable. Dropping the gamma and gain seems to help keep the backgrounds dark. I must make an effort to record the values I use for all the sliders.

Thursday 9th August 2007

jupiter-to-antares.jpg
I set everything up ready last night, but the forecast was wrong and there was hardly a break in the clouds. The best I managed was a 2 star alignment and that was only because I could get Arcturus through the coulds with a 1 second exposure. I didn’t get any images with the SPC900 but I did mount the Fuji S9500 piggy style and got some wide angle shots of Jupiter and the Deneb area.

This image is Jupiter in centre with Antares the lower of five bright stars below. The area also encompasses M80 and M4 but the sky is too light to see them although M80 is just visible if I tweak the levels in Photoshop.

You can see from the orange sky how bad the light polution and high clouds were.

The camera was set to 30 second exposure at F5, ISO800.

 The star to the right of Jupiter is not a moon as I first thought, but Omega Ophiuchi, a magnitude 4.43 star.

The image was taken at 08-08-2007 22:17BST

Tuesday 7th August 2007

It was unexpectedly clear last night so I took the decision late in the evening to get the scope out and setup in the dark. Everything went together fine, Polaris was just outside the circle so I made the final adjustments and readied myself for a couple of hours of imaging. I can’t be out too late with my alarm set for 6am so made a mental note to start packing up after midnight.

The session seemed to be going ok, I was able to find targets and went inside to leave the LX do it’s thing without me causing unnecessary vibrations. I managed to get AVIs of M16, M81, M82, M51, M31,M57, M20 and M27 with a short clip of Cor Caroli thrown in for good measure. What I hadn’t noticed, by not watching the imaging sessions, was that I had a lot of movement in the mount and my 40 second exposures where nearly all reduced to short streaks rather than fine points.
k3ccd_0001-m82-a.jpg
Processing has been a little disappointing with very few usable frames. This M82 is not too bad but you can see from the strange shape of the stars that things didn’t go to plan. I’ll take my time over the M31, I think I’ve got faint dust lanes outside the centre of the galaxy, but it may just be my imagination.

To think I’d re-targetted these M’s to improve on those I already had – that’ll teach me! I must sort something out with the guidescope if I’m going to get any long exposures over 40 seconds.

Hopefully the IR/UV filter will arrive tomorrow, that’ll give me something new to experiment with.

———–

k3ccd_0001-m82.jpg

I’ve just reprocessed the M82 image using K3CCDTools instead of my usual first choice Registax. I processed the result as x2 and then desaturated the image in PhotoShop. I was comparing the image with Starry Night to see what details I was missing when I noticed the star below the galaxy (to the right in the image) has an apparent magnitude of 17.6. I think this may be the faintest star I’ve imaged (and noticed) to date.